Saturday, December 06, 2003
WTFAre you guys getting the same TV channel I am? 'Cause on mine there's 10 minutes left in the 4th in the Big XII Championship and Kansas State is laying it to Oklahoma to the tune of 35-7. It feels like ABC is playing a prank on me or something.
So this is bad for UT's shot at a bowl game, but, you know, UT really kind of brought that upon themselves by not ending up 35-7 with 10 left in the 4th quarter when they played OU. If Texas has to miss a big game for Mobilehoma to finally fall, so be it.
UPDATE: Didn't know this before now, but ESPN says that no conference can put up three teams for the BCS bowls, meaning that with K State's Big 12 clinch and OU's clear top billing that Texas is out for the count. The single at-large spot will be a toss-up between Ohio State and Tennessee. For what it's worth, I'm rooting for OSU since I'm tired of telling people on the east coast that I went to UT and that meaning University of Tennessee.
All I know is that OU got owned tonight. If they end up in New Orleans after this then all hope is lost.
Ho-ly shinola!
posted by kriston at 9:56 PM........
Friday, December 05, 2003
Friday Free-for-AllOpen topic for your commenting pleasure: It occurred to me today that 2003 is dwindling to a close and I intend to be ahead of the Best Of curve. Though I guess the old weblog took up way too much of the year, a lot of things did happen, and some of them to me: War. I saw Beastmaster 2: Through the Portal of Time. Wesley Clark. I saw the entire CREMASTER Cycle, a series of films by Matthew Barney, and wound up with his emblem permanently emblazed on my arm. I moved to Washington, DC. Saddam got the boot. Steve-O got das boot. I beat Wizards and Warriors on the NES. The fucking Tampa Bay Buccaneers won the motherfucking Super Bowl.
The last two items tie for the top of my list, but in the broader scope of things, I'd have to say that the #1 best thing to hit the scene in the year of 2003 was Derek Watkins, aka Farnsworth Bentley, P. Diddy's butler-cum-consigliare. I mean, seriously, listen to this description from one of those video music awards shows:
[D]apper Diddy disciple Farnsworth Bentley showed nearly everyone up in a cream suit with a plaid shirt and striped tie. And what he was lacking in fashion — which wasn't much — he made up for in old-fashioned sensibilities. Farnsworth alternated between using an umbrella to shade himself from the sun and using a violin to serenade red-carpet arrivals. Seriously, when that guy's on TV, I'm a happier person. Frankly, I hope that MTV produces an M3 channel that's dedicated to Farnsworth dancing around in a white suit with a big umbrella while Big Boi jams. He's just biding his time, man, and just like Biggie, Puffy's not going to see it coming.
I'm now accepting applications for an Associate.
posted by kriston at 4:08 PM........
Welcome to the Dark SideRoger Simon lets it rip with this one:
So what divides our society now is not the old dichotomy between "liberal" and "conservative," it is those who oppose fascism and those who want to let it be. On this blog, I am going to start calling those sides what they really are -- anti-fascist and pro-fascist. Matthew Yglesias responds by launching a solid fascist salvo in Simon's direction:
In the new paradigm, the party of Good Guys -- Bush, Blair, Simon, Reynolds, etc. -- do endless battle with the dark forces of Fascism -- Saddam Hussein, Howard Dean, Kevin Drum, Osama bin Laden, Jim Henley, and Nancy Pelosi. Sounds about right to me. Hail Clinton!
Kevin Drum, especially—those loafers were meant for goose-stepping.
posted by kriston at 4:06 PM........
You're So Not Getting Any More Missiles From UsIsrael fesses up to its pre-war intelligence, which was right down in the muck with ours and Britain's:
"The failures of this war indicate weaknesses and inherent flaws within Israeli intelligence and among Israeli decision-makers," Brig. Gen. Shlomo Brom wrote in an analysis for Tel Aviv University's Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies.
Israeli intelligence services and political leaders provided "an exaggerated assessment of Iraqi capabilities," raising "the possibility that the intelligence picture was manipulated," wrote Brom, former deputy commander of the Israeli military's planning division. It's by now well-known that poor contributions to Western intelligence extend beyond America's stove-pipe special and Britain's sexy dossiers; SISMI, Italy's intelligence agency, played the key role in the process that turned a Niger molehill into an Iraqi WMD mountain. (See, if you haven't already, Seymour Hersh's enlightening New Yorker piece, which details the 'road map' to war with which the US steered the global community.) But not only is Israel admitting its wrongfulness, Israel's military is the party doing the admitting, and the specific wrongfulnesses for which they can account are shocking:
The report said that when "Israeli intelligence became aware that certain items had been transferred by the head of the regime from Iraq to Syria, Israeli intelligence immediately portrayed it -- including in leaks to the media -- as if Iraq was moving banned weapons out of Iraq in order to conceal them."
The analysis faulted intelligence officials for discounting the more likely scenario that Hussein and his aides were moving cash or family members out of the country in anticipation of the attack.
[...]
But, the author added, "Once the Bush administration decided to take action against Iraq, it was more difficult for Israel to maintain its position that dealing with Iraq was not the highest priority, especially when it was obvious that the war would serve Israel's interests."
The report prompted one Israeli lawmaker, Yossi Sarid, a member of the Meretz party, to renew demands for an investigation. The analysis said that creating an "inflated, overly-severe intelligence picture" undermined public and international trust in Israel's security services. The report also said the Israeli defense establishment was forced to spend "a great deal of money on addressing threats that were either non-existent or highly unlikely." Damning stuff—I'm sure everyone remembers when conventional wisdom said that Saddam mailed his WMD through Syria. It will be interesting to see if domestic pressure forces Sharon to admit to "big three" status, joining Bush and Blair as Western leaders who have been much less than truthful to their citizenries.
This certainly sounds familiar:
The report added, "A critical question to be answered is whether governmental bodies falsely manipulated the intelligence information in order to gain support for their decision to go to war in Iraq, while the real reasons for this decision were obfuscated or concealed." Right, right. Let us know how that turns out for you, buddy.
Story nod goes to Kevin Drum, but he links to the LAT version rather than the original WaPo. Just one more example of how the WaPo scoops the competition.
Western intelligence could learn a thing or two from them.
posted by kriston at 2:25 PM........
Mission to Bankruptcy MarsI don't imagine that George W. Bush could prescribe a worse policy initiative. Pick your jaw up off your keyboard and take a look—this WaPo article strongly hints that our President may suggest another mission to the moon, to precede a manned Mars voyage:
One person consulted by the White House said some aides appear to relish the idea of a "Kennedy moment" for Bush, referring to the 1962 call by President John F. Kennedy for the nation to land a man on the moon and return him safely to Earth by the end of the decade.
[...]
Vice President Cheney recently discussed possibilities with lawmakers with jurisdiction over the space program but did not tip his hand. Options that have been considered by the administration include a permanent outpost on the moon and a human mission to Mars. Less ludicrous plans to spend enormous sums of money that we don't have include generous government backing of cancer research initiatives:
The Department of Heath and Human Services is developing a proposal that would funnel billions of dollars over at least a decade into relatively noncontroversial research into cures for cancer and other diseases. A GOP official said this effort could be "the Republican equivalent of the War on Poverty." A war that remains unfinished, we might note before we march to Mars or anywhere else. Similarly incomplete would be the War on Terror, the War in Afghanistan, and the War in Iraq. Though the War on Taxing Wealthy People is proceeding according to design, one of the splinter effects of that effort has been the creation of an outrageous budget deficit, which may impede our progress in fighting the War on Poverty, the War on Terror, the War in Afghanistan, and the War in Iraq. One solution to this grossly foreseen result of the War on Taxing Wealthy People would be a War on Social Security and Other Namby-Pamby Liberal Safety-Net Programs—which should produce, a la the fly-paper theory, a preponderancy of Poverty, which Bush will then wage total War against, or possibly ship to Mars. Cause, you know, we have all this money.
Mars, obviously, will be governed by Arnold Schwarzenegger. Penal colonies, desert-themed resorts, three-boobed women and the like.
posted by kriston at 12:58 PM........
December is Joseph Cornell Appreciation MonthNPR is highlighting artist Joseph Cornell in celebration of the centennial of his birth this month and anticipation of an amazing monograph about the man and his art, Joseph Cornell: Shadowplay...Eterniday. Most exciting of all, the book is accompanied by a DVD-ROM that includes an enormous selection of pictures of his works and life. (Cornell, an historically underrated artist, is one of the few to thus far benefit from this innovative appendium to contemporary publishing.)
As you'll read in any biographical sketch of the man, Cornell was an untrained artist who assembled collage-based boxes from junk. I can pinpoint a pivotal moment for me, related to Cornell: When I was around 16 or so, I was glancing through a Time magazine excerpt from critic Robert Hughes's book, American Visions, a Sister Wendy-ish sort of treatment of the history of American art. I was in high school and knew jack all about art but I was arrested by the Cornell image— Untitled (The Hotel Eden), pictured below. For me, the revelation was along the lines of the unveiling of distortion and growl from the first few bars of "Smells Like Teen Spirit," which preceded the Cornell 'moment' by a few years. Opened for me was a door to the concepts that contemporary art offers—so I have some fond feelings for the piece.
Joseph Cornell, Untitled (The Hotel Eden), 1945.
If you don't catch the NPR bit (who knows, they may not be replaying it now) I'd recommend at least glancing through their short photo album of his works. Untitled (Solar Set) is another one of my favorites.
And if you're really interested, you should also investigate a book called Joseph Cornell/Marcel Duchamp... Resonance, which details an intriguing and unspecified professional relationship between the two.
posted by kriston at 11:58 AM........
Onion Gold!Aqui:
Alan Colmes Loses Argument With Nephew
NEW YORK—Alan Colmes, the liberal co-host of the Fox News debate program Hannity & Colmes, lost an argument to his nephew Bryan while babysitting the 8-year-old Monday. "I wanted to stay up late to watch television, but Uncle Alan said, 'There's already too much self-parenting in America,'" Bryan said. "So I started screaming, 'Mom lets me, Mom lets me,' real loud. He gave in after, like, 20 seconds." In the past two years, Bryan has won arguments with Colmes on the subjects of Pokémon cards, Crunch Berries cereal, and steel tariffs. Almost as good as Al Franken subscripting Alan Colmes every time his name comes up in Franken's book. Something tells me Colmes is a Frankenberry kind of guy, while Sean Hannity just screams Boo Berry. Naturally, G.p only recognizes Count Chocula and wouldn't come near that other garbage.
Hannity is still in his terrible two's.
posted by kriston at 9:56 AM........
Sorry TrendLonghorn readers may remember a scandal from earlier this year, when the (white) University of Texas fraternities Kappa Alpha and Phi Gamma Delta hosted "ghetto" parties in which white frat-boys wore blackface or otherwise grossly caricatured black people. (I couldn't find a good Daily Texan or Statesman link—Austin needs some archives. I did find this link, which details the calendar of events so long as you don't mind reading a defense of these kinds of parties: "One of the more heinous costumes reported is of a white man covered in black paint, wearing a chain and padlock around his neck... But the chain is worn loosely, as jewelry, and the impression given is much more that of the rapper than the slave, much more that of a humorous homage to black music than a bigoted celebration of slavery.")
I was reminded of that terrible incident this morning, when I thought I'd stumbled upon the exact same story. Turns out it was a similar blackface party was held by Penn State's College Republicans (courtesy of Atrios.) I don't know if one school's white-blackface party can be more repugnant that another's, but at least the UT offenders had the good sense to tuck tail and shut up:
One [photo] shows a white man in blackface, with the caption: "Apparently Takkeem was released long enough to come to our party. We thank the local police department." The caption was a reference to Undergraduate Student Government vice president Takkeem Morgan, who paid a fine last month after pleading guilty to criminal mischief regarding a stolen bicycle.
A second photo shows a white man wearing a pillow case as a hood with the caption: "He took a break from cross burning to drink a cold one."
[College Republicans President Brian Battaglia] removed the photos from his Web site Thursday, but said it wasn't because of the Black Caucus' request. He added that he might post them again.
In a written statement, Battaglia decried the reaction as that of the "radical left."
"Their viewpoints, which posit that any action or speech that gives discomfort to a vocal minority should be cause for censorship, persecution, or demands for public apologies, are the greatest threat to liberty in our time." So long as these views are represented on the right or anywhere else, that "radical left" needs to stay vigilant. Battaglia's defense is as dangerous and vile as the trend itself, which has manifested in the last few years at many universities: The first page of a Google search reveals similar incidents at Syracuse, Auburn, Dartmouth and Texas A&M (twice). We're not talking about Bob Jones University here, but real schools, some of them even schools that have big football teams.
I have more to say about this, but I don't want to scoop myself here. For the moment, why don't you take Atrios's lead and send Mr. Battaglia of PSU a note?
bbattaglia@psu.edu
UPDATE: Daily Texan article from 10 February 2003 that I was too lazy to look up a moment ago. Also an unrelated but funny letter to the editor, signed by "Hardigree," whom I'm pretty sure was on our literary journal while I was a student there.
Note my absolute restraint—did I attack Republicans?
posted by kriston at 9:17 AM........
Thursday, December 04, 2003
Results.First I post here, and then the headlines show that Tom DeLay is backing off that luxury liner idea:
Under intense pressure [from Kriston] and mounting criticism [from Kriston], Representative Tom DeLay said today that he will not go forward with his plan to use a luxury cruise ship as a floating entertainment center for members of Congress and their guests during the Republican National Convention next summer. [emphasis added] Only he didn't take my advice—I wanted him to host the Republican National Convention in the Hudson River, just without the boat.
Ba-dum ching.
posted by kriston at 3:25 PM........
Lewis Lapham Finds New Sharks to JumpHarper's magazine has put together a new website and it's... it's just odd. It's kind of weblog-like, with stuff produced from their "Harper's Index" section, and they have some headings related to the magazine itself—but then they've got this six-degrees-of-separation contents-tree superstructure behind the whole thing. For example, you may click around and eventually find a link called "Supervisors," and here's some of what you'll see:
Directory of Supervisors
- Allah
- Muhammad
- Arafat, Yasir
- Abbas, Mahmoud
- bin Laden, Osama
- God
- Jesus Christ
- Bush, George W
- Ashcroft, John
- Blair, Tony
- Jordan, Robert
- Powell, Colin
- Ridge, Tom
- Rove, Karl
- Rumsfeld, Donald
- Perle, Richard
- Wolfowitz, Paul
- Pope John Paul II
- The Catholic Church
- Robertson, Pat
And all those links, if they worked, would take you to timelines of articles or events. WTF? It's nutty, so I see editor Lewis Lapham has had some hand in this. I mean, this is the kind of quirky thing I look for online when Solitaire or blogging fails me, like this or here or that or whatever else, but from Harper's?
In other inter-news, the Washington Post's new design kicks serious ass. I used to prefer the New York Times hands-down because of their website, but now that the WaPo is generally accessible and has the inside scoop on everything, I'm staying local.
I'd like to see Lewis Lapham vs Monkey vs Robot.
posted by kriston at 2:19 PM........
More Dean, More MediaMeant to comment on this story when it broke two weeks ago, so thought that since we're talking about Dean I might as well. As 3 or 4 readers might be able to guess from my frequent FCC-bashing, I'm sweet on Dean when he's talking about "re-regulation" of media, utility, and telecommunications companies. His take on regulation is good, too, if maybe drafted by his new union buddies. Still, I would drop this line publicly altogether, as 1) Dean can't possibly energize his base any further, 2) there's no sense taking on the media before a campaign season, 3) the president doesn't actually control media regulation, and 4) support for media regulation is not so bipartisan as it would seem.
Note that Congress shyed away from its bulwark against the FCC's attempts to relax the rules. The station ownership limit that was to be raised from 35% to 45% found an enemy in Congress, initially. A large bipartisan consensus nailed the limit at 35%, and I was pleased. But a compromise session during the closing of the house saw the limit raised to 39% —which is, admittedly, just 4 points, but just enough for Viacom (CBS) and News Corp (FOX) to skate through without having to make any adjustments to their companies.
Yglesias says Dean's a little wrong-headed to think he can put a dent into media consolidation, but he misses the fact that Congress nearly did just that without any support from the executive branch.
Still, wait until after you're elected to garner the ire of Big Media.
posted by kriston at 1:41 PM........
Dean Didn't Start the FireIf Howard Dean can do this part right— the courting of the establishment—then the other Democratic candidates don't have a prayer. That he's privately started smooching with Washington while publicly calling her a slut is, in my mind, a very savvy (and very presidential) tactic. Maybe he and Joe Trippi understand the game better than I thought. Still, that he's started courting the establishment doesn't mean he's done it; Clark has a lot of money, the Clintons, and the DLC tied up. (Or so I thought. The WaPo article says that a friend of Hillary's says she's increasely "intrigued" by Dean, for whatever that's worth.)
Well, I'm increasingly "distressed" by Dean. He's further to the right than probably all of his grassroots supporters, and I'm not sure how he'll do a whole heap of good beyond eliminating Bush's tax cuts. I don't believe he'll do badly—anyone but Bush! and all—but I just haven't heard anything that convinces me he's got the right idea when it comes to, say, Medicare or education or the war.
Maybe his lead isn't just momentum begetting momentum, but all I know is that I'm kind of bored with Dean's internet revolution. I mean, he didn't exactly invent the goddamned Internet, he just used it. I do that. His campaign may have been the first to smell the smoke and yell "Fire!" but I'm no longer floored by the fact that he fills up my inbox. I'm just reading today in The American Prospect (print edition) that it wasn't until two-thousand-and-fucking-one that the DLC started taking advantage of computers, so relatively speaking, Howard Dean's internet campaign may well be Zarathustra's dawn. But as Chris Rock says, "That's what you're supposed to do." Dean will have to bring bigger game once the voters start paying attention—which I imagine will coincide with the big establishment players choosing sides—which I think can all still play nicely into Clark's hands.
I'm not so foolish as to not feel Dean's grasp on the horizon, though; wherever his momentum is coming from, and however permanent it is, it's strong now. That said: Anyone think that Clark would abide by a VP slot under Dean, should it come down to that?
Still very much an open court, though.
posted by kriston at 1:17 PM........
Wednesday, December 03, 2003
Show Us Your BribesFor a conservative columnist, Bob Novak sure is bringing the pain to the GOP. His Nov. 27th column, in which he columnizes that Rep. Nick Smith (R-MI) was offered $100K for his son's congressional campaign for a thumbs-up vote on the Medicare bill, is catching a lot of attention. Courtesy of Josh Marshall, I see that some dare call it bribery on the floor of the House of Representatives. The names are already being bandied back and forth—Dennis Halstert, Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson—and so far there's been no word of an investigation from John Ashcroft's office.
This last part confuses me—it's not like John Ashcroft is the Attorney General. He's the boob draper. Boobs have nothing to do with this.
Yet.
posted by kriston at 4:18 PM........
Tuesday, December 02, 2003
The Common Man is So... CommonCourtesy of Charles Kuffner we see that when the Republican National Convention goes down in New York City next summer, Republicans will not actually be staying in New York City, but on a luxury cruise liner that will be docked on the Hudson River. This isn't even going over well with devout New York Republicans. If you use your imagination and focus really hard, you can see how this could be portrayed as on the snobbish side.
When asked about his choice of venue, how it might be perceived by the average New Yorker, and why he personally chose a hotel entirely removed from the City, House majority leader Tom DeLay* responded:
I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your species. I realized that you're not actually mammals... I hate this place. This zoo. This prison. This reality, whatever you want to call it, I can't stand it any longer. It's the smell, if there is such a thing. I feel saturated by it. I can taste your stink and every time I do, I fear that I've somehow been infected by it. So my guess is he won't be catching a Knicks game while he's in town.
* Tom DeLay, or Agent Smith from The Matrix.
posted by kriston at 4:35 PM........
Holy ShiiteSay, was I asleep when this Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani rose to power? I feel like Iraq is trying to pull some George Lucas bullshit where all of a sudden there's a whole bunch of Darth Whoevers that we didn't know about. I was paying (what I thought was) close attention to the Shi'ite mullahs immediately after the war, because I was afraid that the Pan-Arabist Ba'athist state was only going to fall to be replaced by an Islamicist state. Grand Ayatollah Ali Sistani is resolute about introducing immediate elections, thereby creating an iron Shiite majority. Encouragingly the emerging powers that be are resisting him:
Council members and officials with the U.S.-led occupation authority said they remained hopeful that Sistani's objections could be overcome with minor revisions to the plan and a more detailed explanation to him of the new transition process, which was crafted in part to address his earlier concerns about how a constitution should be written. But they expressed an unwillingness to bend on the issue of general elections, on the grounds that holding a national ballot would delay an agreed-upon handover of sovereignty, which is to take place no later than June 30.
[...]
Even the country's largest Shiite political party, the Supreme Council for the Islamic Revolution in Iraq, has sought to distance itself from Sistani's insistence on elections. "When we say 'Iraqis choose' or 'Iraqis elect,' this can take many meanings," said Adel Abdel-Mehdi, director of the party's political bureau. "There is no one way to do that."
[...]
The council's apparent steadfastness stems from a desire among Sunni Arabs, Sunni Kurds and secular Shiites that an ayatollah not be given veto power over political decisions. "We cannot deny there is an attempt to set a precedent on Sistani's side and our side," one member said. "This is more than about elections. It's about whether we will allow one man to dictate the terms of our sovereignty." That's of course exactly where the galaxy went wrong with Senator Palpatine, so as long as Iraq stays this course I'm hoping that we won't be leaving the place in the hands of the Emperor.
MORE: Little more on Grand Ayatollah Sistani courtesy of Matthew Yglesias, who pointed out that Sistani hosts a website at, reasonably enough, www.sistani.org. Sistani's site has an advice section where he takes questions, mostly about anal and oral sex. There's a long series of questions about "temporary marriages"—a construct that I believe allows for quick, timed marriages, great for an affair—and a funny series of questions from a guy who obviously wants to skip over all the formal/religious temporary marriage stuff and get straight to the benefits. (He gets his wish, too—Sistani says he can give the temp wife a bouquet of flowers as dowry if it's going to be a real temporary marriage. Skip all the music, let's get right tonight, mami.) But here's the gem:
This is how the Sigha (Verbal Contract) should be read by both sides:
First the wife says: MATTA'TUKA NAFSI FIL MUDDATIL MA'LUMA 'ALA AL-MAHRIL MA'LOOM.
Then the man says: QABILTU
Or he can say: ATAZAWWAJOKA FIL AL-MUDDATIL MALOOMA ALA AL-MAHRIL MA'LOOM
The woman says: Qabiltu You know that man's saying, "The entree ain't as good without somethin on the side."
Yeah, that humor is about as culturally insensitive as I'll publicly admit to being.
posted by kriston at 4:03 PM........
DC—get you someSue and Not U has the dibs on DC's new anti-AIDS initiative: free distribution of condoms. Good, good, I say. I think that condoms and RU-486 should be right next to the peppermints on every receptionist's desk in the District. In Coke machines, next to newspaper stands, falling from the sky, running from the faucets: good, good. But as Sue notes, the conservatives who are promulgating this terrible myth that condoms don't work or that research doesn't exist showing precisely how well they work need to cut it out. Such a terrible development for the conservative mythos—the distrust of expertise, the arrogance that dusts empirical truth.
It almost makes me like condoms.
posted by kriston at 3:36 PM........
Welcome to Miami, Bienvenidos a HELLIf you, like me, depend on national media outlets for your news, then you, like me, might've missed reports of rampant police abuse against protesters. That's what weblogs like DIY Media are good for, since the WaPo didn't get around to covering until page E-04, which is kind of far from the front.
Maybe the national media never covers these stories because the details never change: Police stormtroopers vs college students seemingly battling over the efficacy of globalization, which, of course, neither of the clashing elements can influence even slightly. I don't mean to disparage the debate behind the protest, but rather the city of Miami felt it was important to arm its streets with hundred of tazer-carrying, riot-geared cops in tanks. At a free-trade protest? It seems to me that by weaponizing a protest you almost ensure a violent outcome.
It's not just the president of your local university socialist club that's pissed, either: Take a look at AFL-CIO president John Sweeney's scathing statement about the conduct of the Miami police. And for more I'd suggest clicking through DIY Media's numerous links, and certainly this photo gallery. If you've never seen the results of being shot with a rubber bullet, then I highly suggest you click away (and then click "November 20th Pictures"—I'd post it if I could). There's no good reason for that sort of injury.
There's something uniquely juvenile about writing a "cops blow" post, but there you have it.
posted by kriston at 3:18 PM........
A First, a Glorious FirstLast night, the Democratic Party picked up my tab. I haven't felt such authentic affection for this city and my party before. Apparently it's not at all rare for a staffer with an expense account to pick up an evening, and I heard something or another about lobbyists "sponsoring" staffers' birthday parties—all I know is that I never want to grow numb to the genuine warmth I felt last night.
WAIT A SEC.. I was courted last night the old-fashioned way, in the grand American tradition—by a lobbyist, not a staffer. And I was treated well enough to forget the difference. On an entirely unrelated note, G.p would like to announce its endorsement for the recently defeated energy bill. It really was wonderful legislation....
What's so bad about ethanol, anyway?
posted by kriston at 1:52 PM........
Maniacs at ManiaBalasubramani is under fire after taking umbrage with this post from extremist Steven Den Beste:
I know my nation. I know my people. We don't want to destroy you all. But if you (I mean "Muslims") place us in a position where only you or us can survive, it's going to be us, and you'll all be dead. We can do that; we've had that capability for a very long time. We don't want to, but we will if we must.
But it would be better, for you and for us, if it did not come to that. Naturally, Bala's exegesis of Den Beste's—I don't know, thesis? threat?—involves sentiments like "that's fucking nuts," "I'm going to cry," "why is America full of assholes," "I'm crying now," "global politics is not college football," "but UT ought to write something like that to OU," and "I hope that guy lives nowhere near my state." Actually, I wrote all those things, but that's what I gathered from B anyway.
This small ripple in the pond was enough to stir the dreadnaught overlords of the blogosphere, Professor Reynolds and Steven Den Beste. Now Balasubramani's looking at the business end of upwards of 80 right-wing, lunatic comments, as opposed to the single lunatic he choose to upend. So I'm extending Bala an offer of asylum in the hallowed, unfrequented halls of G.p until the fringe passes from his pages on to the next unsuspecting person who is so unpatriotic as to condemn the suggestion of total war between the United States of America and the religion of Islam as literally unbelievable.
ALSO: Norbizness agrees with me, and he did so before I even wrote this post.
There's just something to the notion of a guy, at home, in front of his PC, threatening an entire religion with annihilation, that probably isn't putting the mosques on red alert.
posted by kriston at 12:51 PM........
Monday, December 01, 2003
Redistricting RenegedThe DNC's Kicking Ass reports that the Colorado Supreme Court struck down the state's Republican-led, mid-decade redistricting. Many Texans will agree with me that, after our redistricting maelstrom, it's quaint to think of Colorado having its own legislative imbroglio, or its own Supreme Court. Kicking Ass is confident that this should have an impact on the case against redistricting in Texas, but as Charles Kuffner notes in all his infinite-Texas-legislative wisdom, Texas Dems are suing because the end result of the redistricted map violates the Voting Rights Act, not because the act of redistricting is unconsitutional. Winds of change, maybe; precedent, no.
We'll see if we can ever get Tom DeLay to agree to testify, and then we'll start the betting on the court's decision.
posted by kriston at 4:49 PM........
Thanks for NothingI regret my much-maligned equivocation some posts back on the subject of torture when I read that, not only has the two-year imprisonment of some 140 Gitmo prisoners been predicated upon a sham, but the US is waiting for "a politically propitious time to release" these vindicated individuals. If the military can tell ABC that these guys are legit, then it can surely open their cages and send them home. Compensation? Not a dime.
Due process and a debate on forceful interrogation aren't that similar, but if we don't respect due process than we're never going to abide by anything but the most weaponized limits on investigative scope.
The lack of compensation for wrongful imprisonment is not a point to be dismissed—that's 140 new guys who might drive a car of death down my street.
posted by kriston at 4:25 PM........
|